Tuesday, 29 December 2015
Ghashiram Kotwal
Ghashiram Kotwal
-Vijay
Tendulkar
Vijay Tendulkar was a leading playwright, movie and TV.
writer, literary essayist, political journalist and social commentator
primarily I Marathi. He best known for his play
“Shantanu ! Court
Chalu ahe”
“Ghashiram Kotwal”
“Sakharam Binder”
Many of Tendulkar’s plays derived inspirational from real
life incidents.
He began his career from newspaper. He had written several
plays but didn’t get response from audience therefore he took vow to not write
but again breaking his vow in 1956 he wrote “Shrimant” which establish him as a
good writer.
This play is satire on city or powerful people who are cheating
with poor people for their own benefit. The lower classes are kind and honest
but they change their attitude after the interaction with upper class
(authority). The story is raise and fall of Kanaujian Brahmin. Ghashiram is a
protagonist but yet he becomes antagonist in a way.

Ghashiram is a Kanaujian Brahmin. He comes to city with a
dream of golden future. He caught as a thief on the first day in the city. He
was arguing that he is not thief but police are not listening and then he took
a vow
“I’ll make pig, pigs of all of you.
I will make this Poona a kingdom of pigs.
Then I’ll be Ghashiram again the son of Savaldas one more”.
He is a Brahmin come with a hope to Poona. He is an honest and full of all good
qualities but the police made mistake and s he decide to be a cruel.
“The thief is a simple thief,
The police are official thief”.
The official people don’t know the rules and regulation of
their status. They are not dutiful towards their job but they are doing for the
sake of power or money.
Nana asked Gaudi from Ghashiram. First he decline but later
on agree with one condition that
“To shut people’s mouth makes me the Kotwal of Poona”
He surrender his daughter to Nana and he made such a trick
rules for people like nothing do wrong without permit, nobody moves on road
after 11pm, if any go against rule then he will give dangerous punishment.
For example: A man was not thief but Ghashiram pll out his
nail and wash by lemon juice soap and a steel heated boll given in his hand.
While the authority of Ghashiram crime and prostitution are
decrease where as prisoner and revenue are increase.
Gauri Oder Nana does Ghashiram rules”
He is totally in insanity of taking revenge. He fail to
understand the true face of Nana. He becomes a toy of Nana’s hand and Poona’s
people are not trust on him because e is an outsider. Everyone is anger on him.
He has misused the power.
Nana Phadnavis is a lustful man. There are prostitution
areas in his authority. He has power so no one can shake him. He is destroyed
the life of poor girls. Once he offers any girl then any how he works to get
her like Gauri.
How beautiful formed
What a lovely figured!
Did you see!
Whenever he look at new girl then ever some deeds grow up in
his heart. He misused his power.
Early there was all permission for powerful people. Nana had
six marriages and the seventh marriage displayed in the play.
“Peshawar’s chief minister is still young and his mustache
not turn grey his teeth are not gone, look is not enough”
Here we find irony that Nana is old but still he is
marriage. There doesn’t make age difference for Nana to marriage. Even he is
not considering the life of bride. He is happy with his life and other side
people are victim of his joy.
Later on, Ghashiram asked about his daughter but he doesn’t
respond properly. He is in search of his daughter and found that she is no
more. He starts regretting and feels guilty for his condition. He confused
everything but what is the need of it because everything is done.
Again he goes to take revenge with Nana but Nana has power
to make people relax. At first Nana afraid of Ghashiram but then he though the
lesson of Bhagvat Geeta.
“This hand never kills even an insect”
“In this hand is only the flute of Krishna”.
He pretending as he is not sinner. He is pure man. He advice
him that death is meaningless and body will not stay on earth only remain ass.
He thinks that he is a knowledgeable and behaved as a God. He is giving the
lesson of existentialism that meaningless life and meaningless death.
The people were not satisfied with the reign of Ghashiram so
they raised voice against him. They gave one paper to Nana for sign and they
success. They come to near the Ghashiram’s house and throw stone on Ghashiram.
He is speaking as
“Hit me beat me
Beat me some more
Hit me”
He killed as an animal. To tie with an elephant leg and he
die. The city, Poona becomes the symbol for his life that he had not only
ruined his status and himself but also his family.
This play we can compare with “The Whit Tiger” by Arvind
Adiga. Ghashiram and Balram belong to village and they transfer to city with
the hope of achieving something. They are honest but after the connection with
city people they changed their life. How the superior are looking at inferior
or villager is a common thing in both. We get the idea of Hegel’s master –
slave mentality in both.
One difference we can find in Ghashiram Kotwal that
Ghashiram is victim and destroyed by people or boss where as in white tiger
Balram Hawaii killed his boss, Ashok.
Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Madyabindu by Kajal Oza vaidya
‘Madhyabidu’ is a Gujarati novel by Kajal Oza Vaidya. It is
a love story or faithless story of woman we can call whatever. There is not
directly reason behind the title but it is a woman who loves two peple is a
main point. The narrative technique is different from such novels. She has used
flesh back and past present technique. She has given lots of description about
situation place and thoughts of characters.
The story begins with the scene of Ahmadabad and then
Boston, Where Aditya Bhagvat is studding. He has one friend named Mihir. They
are rich and handsome. Aditya is clever and not more interested in girls. Mihir
often says I am not here for study but as a bodyguard of you so he is
interested in other things rather than study.
Then she has introduced the marriage of Durga with Akshay.
Durga is a dutiful wife and mother. On the age of 38 she met with an accident
and die. Aditya and father Akshay are passed their life in melancholy. After
sometimes Akshay also die.
Aditya met a girl named Priyam and marriage. They are happy.
Aditya is a businessman so he always out of his home. Priyam like to be free
and love to live in forest so Aditya made a beautiful cottage for her in the
forest.
One day she met to Shelrajsingh Rathod. He is a prince and
researcher of wild animal specially Tiger. She falls in love with him. Now she
is spending more time with him. She told him that she is wife of someone.
Whenever her husband came to home she goes there and spent
time with him. She has two side and she always telling but Aditya never asked
more about it.
She loves to drive and one day she met with an accident and
die. Aditya comes in depression when he heard this news. He is not ready to
believe. He felt strong which he never felt even after the death of his parent.
He came out of this situation by Priyam’s one thought that I am always with
you.
Shelraj got the news of death of Priyam after three days. He
was also not ready to believe.
After few days Aditya comes to forest and start living in cottage.
Shelraj came their and comes to know about Aditya so he fainted down. After
that they compromise each other and depart. Adity went to Ahmadabad AND Shelraj
start his life as usual.
Priyam is a faithful wife but because of his husband she
kept affair with Shelraj. He is not speding much time with her. And another
side Aditya has business so how can it possible to live together every time?
Aditya had provided everything to Priyam and no doubt she had loved him till
the end her life but she has no care for anyone and so she believes in happy
life. She had broken the rules of society and also suggests that if a man can
keep relation except his marriage then female also can. She indirectly informs
the equality.
She proves marriage is not restriction for a male or female.
The love is not possible with one person whom we have marriage but it can be
with one or more person.
Generally male have two relations with female and female
have to accept but in this novel situation is apposite.
Thursday, 10 December 2015
‘Two states’ by Chetan Bhagat
‘Two states’ is a story of two lovers from two states,
Punjab and Tamilnadu. In the beginning they are classmate and climax they fall
in love and at the end they had marriage. The couple struggled a lot to
convince their parents for marriage.
Krish is a protagonist of the story. He studied in
Ahmadabad. Dr. Neeta is asking a story to Krish. Krish begin the story from he
met to Ananya in IIM at Ahmadabad. First they just talk and then they get
close. The time is arrived to depart so Annanya was worried. Krish told her if
he gets a good job then he will tell about her future. Finally he gets a job in
Citibank. He is like all Indian as he
wants money. He is only son of his parents.
They decide the meeting of both parents. They went to tour
but Krish’s mother ever suspicious about Ananya’s family. She said that South
Indian girl always trapped North Indian boy. Through her character we can see
the mentality of people. She believes North Indian won’t have heart, they are
black and they don’t know about manner.
Annanya belongs to Tamilnadu. Krish applied his form to get
job in Chennai. He wants to stay close with Annanya. He is an IITian. Ananya
said if he becomes a tutor of her brother Manju then perhaps he won the heart
of her parents. He has done same and her parents recognize about their love
therefore Annanya’s father warn him to stay away from his daughter.
Krish still use to go to their house and try to help them.
He made a presentation of her father. It was nice and praise by people so now
he feels that he can able to win his heart. Krish tried to learn Cernitic music
to impress Radha, Ananya’s mother. He brought some Cernitic music CD for
her. Once he invites her to perform. She
performed well and gets fame. Now she likes Krish. In party Krish announced
that they are love each other. At first Ananya’s parent shocked and then agree.
After that Krish has to convince his parent. He decides to
take Ananya with him to Punjab. Kavita, Krish’s mother doesn’t like Madrasi
(Ananaya). She often avoids Ananya. Ananya only like the cousin sister of Krish
and now she wants to return to her home.
Again they arrange their parents meeting at Goa. Kavita,
Krish’s mother often doubt on Ananya’s family and throw torn on them. Ananya
and her family understand and so she dislikes her parent’s disreputation. She
doesn’t like to keep relation with Krish because of his mother. She never
called and Krish went to meet her at Chennai but she had not talked properly.
Krish needs support but without it he becomes hopeless. He
thinks to be a saint. One side he has problem with Ananya and another side his
family. He believes his father does not love him so he behaved unusual but
after his break up he is paying attention towards his father.
Without telling his son his father went to Ananya’s house at
Chennai to talk about his son’s marriage. He apologies for his wife in front of
Ananya’s parent and he promise them that they will keep their daughter as our
daughter therefore Ananya’s parent like and satisfied for marriage. Annanya
called Krish and tell about the agreement of marriage.
Krish goes to Chennai with barat and finally they got
married.
How the Indian young generation is suffering and the oldest
is always responsible for that relation of both families is their problem then
why they put family in-between two lovers. To get marriage we should keep good
relation with that family also. Why old generation is interfering in younger’s
life and younger wants to make happy to their parents in their decision.
Obviously the people belong to cool area are white and
Ananya belong to hot still she is white. North Indian’s mind set about South
India is backward and so on is it vice versa? Or one side is inferior and
another side is superior.
India is incomplete without saint and respectable family.
Faire skin people thought they are superior and that’s why they doubt on black
people. Ananya and her family’ behave is far better than Punjabi (Krish’s
family). They want money instead of respectable family.
I found the description of place, people and time is similar
as in ‘The White Tiger’ by Arvind Adiga. It shows the Indian culture and
tradition which is complicated. The love story is same in film ‘Ek Duje KE
Liye’ but the end is different.
In reality people wants to marriage in their own cast and in
‘two states’ Kavita wants her son to marriage with Punjabi girl. Women want
lots of things from girls’ side. The family problem is an obstacle of son to
get marriage.
Chetan Bhagat has used an appropriate state as girl from
Tamilnadu and boy from Punjab and breaks the geographical boundary. If he
changed it then perhaps girls’ family is not ready to marriage with Tamil as
same with Krish. Indirectly he present the inferiority and superiority of
people which is not only about America and Europe towards South Asia, Africa
and Australia but every where it is same.
Sunday, 1 November 2015
Old man and The Sea
Old man and The Sea is a philosophical novel by Earnest
Hemingway. The title suggests the conflict between man and Nature. Everything
is symbolic in the novel. Hemingway is a war writer and though he present war
of fish against Santiago. Hemingway shows the idea of clever that we have to be
clever with whatever we have.
The journey of Santiago begins in the morning. He wants to achieve
something but he doesn’t care whether he gets or not. He wants to prove himself
different. The novel gives the idea of birth and death that we come with empty
hand in the world and we have to go same. There is no need to worry about life.
“Thank God he is travelling and not going down”
It speak about fish but we can interpret it as if we find
obstacle in life we should not stop our journey. We should keep a hope and we
have to chase it until we don’t get. Santiago made a goal that whatever happens
but he want fish before he die.
“I’ll stay with you until I am dead”
Death is ultimate reality and we can’t escape from it so we
have to struggle until our death. The language of the novel is simple but in
simplicity Hemingway used ambiguity.
“Anyone can be a fisherman in May”
Santiago went on September, month of storm so he said that
anyone can be fisherman in calm weather but in storm it too difficult. Nature
is goes on changing but we should come out from the situation than we can prove
our skill. He prefers to live alone because no one can criticize him.
He has struggle a lot but still he is enjoying. He has
respect and love for fish. He wants to feed fish but what can do? Because he is
fisherman and therefore he is killing fish. On the journey he has not only care
about himself but also for fish.
“Better weather for me than for you fish”
If weather is calm than it is better for Santiago to catch
fish and if it is not well then it is better for fish that he can be safe.
He is an honest man. He doesn’t wants to kill but he born as
fisherman and therefore he is killing fish.
“Perhaps it was a sin to kill the fish…..
But then everything is a sin.
Do not think about it. You were
Born to be a
fisherman as the
Fish was born to be a
fish”.
The fish was large but the mind of Santiago is more than it
and therefore he becomes triumph to catch fish. He believes
“Every day is a new day and every struggle is a new
struggle”
Therefore we have to goes on struggle rather than stop. Life
is only for fight. If we wish to end life but we can’t end it.
“A man can be destroyed but not defeated”
A man is not born for defeat. A man has to struggle and then
get success. Our life is full of problem but we have to come out of it.
Santiago ever wishes to be boy with him on voyage and he
also goes on his past. It seems he has wish for youth but it will never come
just like tomorrow. He ever feels that he went too far and he put his self in
death and therefore he want to return after achieve something.
Hemingway has presented the idea of existentialism and
continuation. We cannot clearly say, Santiago is winner or loser. He talks
about civil war and world war. The novel itself becomes fish for Hemingway.
Thursday, 29 October 2015
Five point someone
Subtitle: What not to do at IIT!
‘A perfect ten this is 270 pages of pure fun’
‘Five Point Someone’ written by Chetan Bhaget. It is a story
of three engineering student of IIT. They are best friend. Whose GPA grades are
five point something that speak about title. Ever I found IIT student are the
fundamental of nation but throughout the novel I doesn’t clear this idea. Is it
reality of IIT student or fake?
Is grade important or creativity? At the end Alok and Hari
got the job in the company because their grades something higher than Rayan.
Rayan is far ahead leading them in failure or success yet he was failing to get
job after IIT.
Hari is narrator of this novel and he confuse in himself. He
keeps together to other two friends. Rayan is creative he doesn’t like to live
within the control of others. Alok is coming from middle class family. He is
worried about his study and family. Ultimately he has agony of his family but
still he often ready for his friend.
The story begin in IIT(Indian Institute of Technology) that
these three are suppress o raging by senior and Rayan raise his voice and come
out of that. They are living in separate room and studying in one class. They
are romantic and drinking alcohol.
Sometimes Rayan feels that they are controlled by IIT
professor and he doesn’t like this therefor he is doing whatever he likes. They
are giving test and in the first test all three gets five point something. This
is the significant reason of the title.
Hari has girlfriend, who is professor’s daughter. Hari loves
her a lot but he wants to impress her father for his love towards his daughter.
They made a plan to get paper and impress the head. Hari went to Neha’s home on 11th
to get the key of office in which professor has kept paper. There is such a
romantic scene between Hari and Neha. Finally he got but same time professor
return and he come to know about the relation between Hari and Neha. He returns
with the duplicate bunch of key.
They went to professor’s office at night and finally get
paper but security watched them. All professors know about them and angry on
them. They are worried that what will happen? Professor Veeru was with them.
They got punishment as they suspend for one year and they
have to do that semester twice. Alok comes in great depression. He jumped from
second floor and all bond broken.
After two month he became ready. They get opportunity for
new project. They have started hard work. They get success in project so the
punishment was recovered.
On the farewell Neha’s father gave speech in which he spoke
about his son Samir, who die because of his father. Samir’s wish to be
something but his father forced him to get admission in IIT
. He fails trice and then de decides to suicide. He has written a letter to her
sister Neha to whom he loves a lot. In the letter he suggest her that don’t
give letter to father but when Neah wants to hide it and gave it to Hari to
keep it but same time his father came and he think that it is a kind of love
letter but he comes to know about the reality behind the death of his son.
Therefore he suggests everybody that all are clever and if other are studying
in other field it doesn’t mean they are poor. We should do what we like and end
his speech with bless to all for golden future.
At the end Alok and Hari got the job in good company but
Rayan doesn’t. Rayan was a clever and creative but because of fewer grades he
won’t get job. He starts working as a assistant under professor Veeru. Still
Hari worried that Rayan is clever then them but what is the reason behind not
getting job in company.
Friday, 2 October 2015
Waiting For Godot
1. The setting of the play is taken from the painting of Caspar Davis Friedrich. He was inspired by it. In the play ‘waiting’ and in the painting ‘longing .The country road indicates common place. There is no boundary. A tree is radium of expectation. At first it was lifeless and then few leaves grow. It is an allegorical religion symbol.
Night(evening)- will night never come? We are craving for salvation but it never comes on right time. When our goal is near to complete then someone comes and provides hope for next one. It is the end of day. It also signifies the evil things. It makes the cycle of day and night.
2. The tree is only important in setting because it symbolize numerous element like bush, weeping tree. It is used for religious.
In second act there is few leaves grow it suggest the change of nature. Everything is goes on changing. It is for desire. In nothingness but there is a meaning.
3. The beginning of both acts same; evening falls in to night and moon rises. It indicates the repetition of nature. At evening we spent some time for peace and thinking and night we spent time for worthless act. In that act we have some desire and despair for that we are living. Night indicates darkness of life but behind the darkness there is light. Ultimately they are waiting for Godot but they have such expectation that may he will come. Sometimes waiting is nothing but it is reality of life.
4. Debris used as a place of survival in this play. Where we can keep our self hide and free from other. One day everything will be destroyed. The morality is reality. It is the place of good and evil. It is a boundary. It is a useless and nothing can grow in it but we can cultivate.
5. The play begins with the dialogue “Nothing to be done” and still the end nothing happen. They are waiting for Mr. Godot. They don’t know about him and they say that they have kind of acquaintances of Mr. Godot. They are goes on repeating every action. At the end they don’t meet to Mr. Godot. They are passing their time. Nothingness and meaningless of their action itself becomes the theme of this play.
6. The play is positive. It is on genetic crisis. Life is endless ad we goes on adding. One side it doesn’t signify and another side there is layers of meanings. It is the effect of world war.
7. Two props hate and boots used for the mentality of people. The hate used for intellectual (mind, master) and boot for physicality (body, slave). If you goes on searching knowledge or provides everything to body like food ,sex and live happy then there is nothing in life.
8. The obedience of lucky is extremely irritation and nauseatic. His behavior is abnormal. He is treating as pig by his master. In act first he is obedient his master and in second same but he himself wants to surrender to his master. He is happy with this life. He doesn’t want to cross the box or boundary. He is living in death in life. He is a key toy.
9. Godot is a kind of desire, desire for death or success. It is an unfulfilled wish.
10. Yes, the subject of play is not Godot but waiting. The play starts with nothing to be done. There is many dialogue and words are goes on repeating. It signifies the repetition of life.
11. This play is better to read then view because the dialogue and language is too short and simple but it requires a lot of time to think. The words are contextual. We can’t depend on one meaning. The camera is forcing us to look at one thing but the audio visual also helps to better understanding of play. The characters are focusing on different object which indicates their mental process. We can understand through their behavior, facial expression and pause.
12. Vladimir- Estragon – killing time in question and conversation while waiting is an interesting sequence.
Estragon and Vladimir wants to go out but they don’t move because they are waiting for Godot. They are passing their time for waiting.
They thought Godot will come tomorrow but tomorrow never comes. They want to suicide but they expect that he will come. Their expectation makes them waiting.
They want to go but they can’t escape. They are repeating human life. Vladimir is searching answers and Estragon forget everything and busy to maintain his physical body. The main theme is they are passing their time. Their life doesn’t make any different.
13. During the screening of movie there I the effect of existential crisis and meaninglessness of human existence in the irrational and indifference universe. They are searching their life
The play is not free from existentialism. What they are? Why they are here? They are accepting everything. Totally there is no despair in character. They are suffering but still they are enjoying. When the second time boy comes to pass message Of Mr. Godot at that time we can see that they are not free from fear. Crist murcy on us.
14. Vladimir and Estragon talks about ‘hanging’ themselves and commit suicide, but they do not do so because the inner voice is coming out and instinct for life provokes. They become habituate with the life process. First before the act we require habit of thinking. They are acting as eluding the meaningless of life. Their body overpowering their thought.
15. Of course, political reading provides the better understanding of the play. It is about the power of country. Beckett was a disciple of Joyce and Joyce hated England and therefore Beckett makes salve to Lucky. England had power and how it was using it represented by Pozzo. The Second World War focused on European country and specially England, France, Italy, Ireland and Russia and so he used country through characters
Night(evening)- will night never come? We are craving for salvation but it never comes on right time. When our goal is near to complete then someone comes and provides hope for next one. It is the end of day. It also signifies the evil things. It makes the cycle of day and night.
2. The tree is only important in setting because it symbolize numerous element like bush, weeping tree. It is used for religious.
In second act there is few leaves grow it suggest the change of nature. Everything is goes on changing. It is for desire. In nothingness but there is a meaning.
3. The beginning of both acts same; evening falls in to night and moon rises. It indicates the repetition of nature. At evening we spent some time for peace and thinking and night we spent time for worthless act. In that act we have some desire and despair for that we are living. Night indicates darkness of life but behind the darkness there is light. Ultimately they are waiting for Godot but they have such expectation that may he will come. Sometimes waiting is nothing but it is reality of life.
4. Debris used as a place of survival in this play. Where we can keep our self hide and free from other. One day everything will be destroyed. The morality is reality. It is the place of good and evil. It is a boundary. It is a useless and nothing can grow in it but we can cultivate.
5. The play begins with the dialogue “Nothing to be done” and still the end nothing happen. They are waiting for Mr. Godot. They don’t know about him and they say that they have kind of acquaintances of Mr. Godot. They are goes on repeating every action. At the end they don’t meet to Mr. Godot. They are passing their time. Nothingness and meaningless of their action itself becomes the theme of this play.
6. The play is positive. It is on genetic crisis. Life is endless ad we goes on adding. One side it doesn’t signify and another side there is layers of meanings. It is the effect of world war.
7. Two props hate and boots used for the mentality of people. The hate used for intellectual (mind, master) and boot for physicality (body, slave). If you goes on searching knowledge or provides everything to body like food ,sex and live happy then there is nothing in life.
8. The obedience of lucky is extremely irritation and nauseatic. His behavior is abnormal. He is treating as pig by his master. In act first he is obedient his master and in second same but he himself wants to surrender to his master. He is happy with this life. He doesn’t want to cross the box or boundary. He is living in death in life. He is a key toy.
9. Godot is a kind of desire, desire for death or success. It is an unfulfilled wish.
10. Yes, the subject of play is not Godot but waiting. The play starts with nothing to be done. There is many dialogue and words are goes on repeating. It signifies the repetition of life.
11. This play is better to read then view because the dialogue and language is too short and simple but it requires a lot of time to think. The words are contextual. We can’t depend on one meaning. The camera is forcing us to look at one thing but the audio visual also helps to better understanding of play. The characters are focusing on different object which indicates their mental process. We can understand through their behavior, facial expression and pause.
12. Vladimir- Estragon – killing time in question and conversation while waiting is an interesting sequence.
Estragon and Vladimir wants to go out but they don’t move because they are waiting for Godot. They are passing their time for waiting.
They thought Godot will come tomorrow but tomorrow never comes. They want to suicide but they expect that he will come. Their expectation makes them waiting.
They want to go but they can’t escape. They are repeating human life. Vladimir is searching answers and Estragon forget everything and busy to maintain his physical body. The main theme is they are passing their time. Their life doesn’t make any different.
13. During the screening of movie there I the effect of existential crisis and meaninglessness of human existence in the irrational and indifference universe. They are searching their life
The play is not free from existentialism. What they are? Why they are here? They are accepting everything. Totally there is no despair in character. They are suffering but still they are enjoying. When the second time boy comes to pass message Of Mr. Godot at that time we can see that they are not free from fear. Crist murcy on us.
14. Vladimir and Estragon talks about ‘hanging’ themselves and commit suicide, but they do not do so because the inner voice is coming out and instinct for life provokes. They become habituate with the life process. First before the act we require habit of thinking. They are acting as eluding the meaningless of life. Their body overpowering their thought.
15. Of course, political reading provides the better understanding of the play. It is about the power of country. Beckett was a disciple of Joyce and Joyce hated England and therefore Beckett makes salve to Lucky. England had power and how it was using it represented by Pozzo. The Second World War focused on European country and specially England, France, Italy, Ireland and Russia and so he used country through characters
Tuesday, 22 September 2015
Saraswatichandra
-
Goverdhanram Tripathi
Saraswatichandra is one step of the world literature. It’s a
long narrative novel. We can put Saraswatichandra with LA miserable and Wilhelm
master.
There are many characters in the novel and all have quality
according to name. The title is the name of hero Saraswatichandra. Goverdhanram
Tripathi has presented the modernity. Saraswatichandra is narrator of the
novel. The novel startswith temple, Saraswatichandra comesand escape from society
and end with hermitage where he gets marriage with Kusum and come back to home.
Saraswatichandra belong to upper class. He has already
engaged with Kumud and both loving each other. Somehow his mother die and his
father remarriage with Guman. She always suspicion on both. Due to his parent
he escapes the world. Even his father tries a lotto find him but he fail.
Saraswatichandra and Kumud agree with their marriage but he
avoids everything. Kumud gets another marriage with Pramadhan but she never
forgets Saraswatichandra. She suffers a
lot and then decides to suicide. She drown in Subhadra river but fortunately
she rescue by holy woman.
Saraswatichandra convert his identity in Navinchandra and
Kumud in Madhuri. In spite they continuously loved. Goverdhanram Tripathi presents
a kind of pain of woman.Kumud wants to marriage with Saraswatichandra but
unfortunately he avoid everything so her parent arrange her marriage with
Pramadhan, She is not happy with him but what she can do? She gets love from
family but not enough from husband. Here Saraswatichandra also feeling pain of
Kumud, parent and his friend.
A friend chandrakant lost his life for
Saraswatichandra. Finally he success to
find Saraswatichandra.
At the end both met in hermitage. They think about society
that if they will live together then what society will think. They confess
their guilty. She is already married so her sister Kusum marriage with
Saraswatichandra.
Thought the novel Tripathi wants to say that a man can’t
live without family. If a human being wants to live the life of hermitage then
he can. He shows the power of wish and will. All characters are full of hope
but they are helpless. He has presented the love of family. He gives the
character of Rama and Sita to Saraswatichandra and Kumud. The novel is open ended.
Thursday, 17 September 2015
View on two movies: The Scarlet Letter & Hamari Adhuri Kahani
The Scarlet Letter & Hamari Adhuri Kahani
The Scarlet Letter can be interpreting in many ways. The Scarlet Letter &
Hamari Adhuri Kahani Emphasize on woman. A capacity of woman is drown in
both films. Due to husband how woman has to suffer. If she live with belief
like he will come then its ok according to society but still he not come for
longer time then what she do? Whether she remarriage or live with belief.
Woman has to faithful to her husband. Hester and Vidya Balan want to be a
faithful wife and they are really faithful first and they have a hope that
their husband will come. For long time wait and many times torture by society.
If their close relatives or wise person give advice that what is right and what
is wrong for her then what should have to choose. Obviously she suffered a lot
therefor definitely she will start thinking like wise person.
The different between Hester and Vidya Balan is that Hester gave birth to her
child after affair or during her second love and Vidya Balan has already child
of his husband. It’s just like Hamlet and Gertrud. Hester has scared of visible
letter @ and also invisible and Vidya Balan has only invisible. Both have one
symbol to survive that is child.
The use of nature is totally different. In the Scarlet letter forest is used as
innocent, while in Adhuri Kahani floweriest used is a symbol of peace and love.
Nature is something which provides sympathy in their life. It makes their life
beautiful. If we look at the man actor then Shri Hari was Vidya’s husband and
loving her but unfortunately caught by tribal people and made him terrorist
even he tried a lot to come out but he fail. After such a long time he comes to
home. He was totally changed. Even still him loving too much to her wife Vidya.
When he know her affair then he start hatting. It is also not his fault.
In scarlet letter Chillingworth was Hester’s husband. He went away from home.
What exactly happen with him is not described. When he return and comes to know
about Hester’s sin and agree or supporting to authority for her punishment.
In scarlet letter Hester’s lover Dimmesdale loves too much but it is his secret
love. It just likes Cupid and Philomela. Dimmesdale wants his status but during
the hanging time he confesses his love. Emraan Hashmi loves too much to Vidya
Balan and for the sack of that he saved Hari’s life.
The end of both movies is different. In The Scarlet Letter there is open or
happy ending. Due to Hester’s sin Chillingworth suicide. They marriage and site
in a cart and they are going on their journey. There is no meaning of letter
“A’.
And Hamari Adhuri Kahani's end is sad. To save the life of Hari, Emraan Hashmi blast and because of him Vidya Balan is also
died. That symbolizes the half story of these three characters.
Wednesday, 2 September 2015
Power of politics
Who has power or
superiority? Majority or Minority?, Skillful or money man? If a man expert in
English language (or any field) Does he clever? May it's a childish, a child
speak language through imitation even he/she doesn't know the writing skill.
"Feeling of greatness"
Sometimes a fellow
don't aware about their skill but a teacher, judges or his friend make sure
about his skill. He gets fame in particular field and start working on that
same field is he gets same fame?
In literature, Which
is the best one? A scholar goes on praising any work is it best? A writer write the fact about time, place,
and action. Is it good? It will be reality for some unreal for other. The way
of telling the story is the right idea to judging any work?
Who decide right or
wrong / good and evil?
Those judge who never think much.
There is something in
the mind of man that helps to judging the people. if a person gets fame in
particular field then they start judging through that in other field.
Who has power thought or action? It seems
interwoven and interdependent. Only thought or only action doesn't make any sense. Language
We are the student of literature but in scope and ELT class we are the learner of language.There are so many languages in the world. It is man made . Sometimes it betray us. It has such kind of power and without it a man cannot sustain in the world. If a person doesn't know the sound or verbal language then they have gesture and such expression.
For ex : Just focus
on verbal sound
Teacher : What is the chemical formula of water?
Student: H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O.
Teacher: What are you talking about?
Student: Yesterday you said it's H to O.
The language is very
important in life. It help us to understand other people, but it also cheats
us. If we have the language power then we can win others heart.Any language is a
kind of tool or a medium through which we can express our thought, expression,
idea, and emotion. Sometimes it's a kind of wooden toy through which we are
playing.
Student: H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O.
Tuesday, 18 August 2015
Akash Vani
A story of a collegian
girl, vani falls in love with Akash. They think about the marriage. She returns
to home to attain the marriage of her sister. She wants to talk with her
parents about their marriage but unfortunately the got a letter in which her
sister has written about elopement. This becomes a big issues for her
family. Because of such reason her parents suddenly arrange her marriage. Vani
believes that if she tell to her parents then they will be more depress
therefore she decide to marriage with anybody decide by parents.
Finally she got
arrange marriage. Ravi, her husband extremely textually harassed to her.
However she try to adjust with her husband but she cannot tolerate and
twice or thrice she informed her parents. They always gave answer as I
will talk and all will be right.
Once she went to Delhi
with her uncle. There she tell all things to her friends. She was happy with
her friends but she did not cross the limit of wife.
She come back to
maternal home with friends and same time her husband came and start rudely
behave with her. Now, she cannot tolerate much and came out from room and
declare that I can't live with Ravi.
She regrets as perhaps
I could tell all matter to my father.
Whose
life? or who is
controlling our life?
If a daughter elope
then parents think about their life that How we have loved? and always ready
for her happiness and..., What she has done?
If we look at Vani's
life that she wants to make happy to her parents therefore she goes against her
love and what she got?
Mostly children
believe that they get much love from parents. To provide any things is not love
but it is a kind of their duty. Is they really get?
Parents and children
always look at their strategy and both are right in their opinion but if
anybody think of anybody then there is a problem of society.
Somehow we cannot live
freely. We are surrender by someone whether he/she is husband/lover or parents
or society...
A story of a collegian
girl, vani falls in love with Akash. They think about the marriage. She returns
to home to attain the marriage of her sister. She wants to talk with her
parents about their marriage but unfortunately the got a letter in which her
sister has written about elopement. This becomes a big issues for her
family. Because of such reason her parents suddenly arrange her marriage. Vani
believes that if she tell to her parents then they will be more depress
therefore she decide to marriage with anybody decide by parents.
Finally she got
arrange marriage. Ravi, her husband extremely textually harassed to her.
However she try to adjust with her husband but she cannot tolerate and
twice or thrice she informed her parents. They always gave answer as I
will talk and all will be right.
Once she went to Delhi
with her uncle. There she tell all things to her friends. She was happy with
her friends but she did not cross the limit of wife.
She come back to
maternal home with friends and same time her husband came and start rudely
behave with her. Now, she cannot tolerate much and came out from room and
declare that I can't live with Ravi.
She regrets as perhaps
I could tell all matter to my father.
Whose
life? or who is
controlling our life?
If a daughter elope
then parents think about their life that How we have loved? and always ready
for her happiness and..., What she has done?
If we look at Vani's
life that she wants to make happy to her parents therefore she goes against her
love and what she got?
Mostly children
believe that they get much love from parents. To provide any things is not love
but it is a kind of their duty. Is they really get?
Parents and children
always look at their strategy and both are right in their opinion but if
anybody think of anybody then there is a problem of society.
Somehow we cannot live
freely. We are surrender by someone whether he/she is husband/lover or parents
or society...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

